Both the Clek Foonf and Fllo can offer great value for money. They are both equipped with safety features that will keep your child safe and comfortable. I’ll choose the Foonf over the Fllo. Keep reading to know why.

 

(* = affiliate link / image source: Amazon partner program)

Clek Foonf

Vs

Clek Fllo

(* = affiliate link / image source: Amazon partner program)

 

Ideal Use


 

Clek Foonf

Clek Fllo

Rear-Facing Weight:

14 to 50 pounds* (US)

14 to 40 pounds (Canada), the child can sit on his/her own

Rear-Facing Height:

25 to 43 inches

Forward-Facing Weight:

22 to 65 pounds

Forward-Facing Height Limit:

30 to 49 inches

 

Similarities

These two car seats are the replica of one another in terms of weight and height limits. Out of the box, you will have convertible car seats you could use when the baby is roughly three months old. However, if you opt to include an infant thingy in your shopping cart, you could use this with a child that is 5 pounds and 19 inches.

At the Baby Center site, you can find data on the average weight and height of children. They show that boys 6 years of age weigh 41.9 to 50.6 pounds and are 44.2 to 46.9 inches tall. Girls 6 years of age weigh 40.8 to 50.0 pounds and are 43.9 to 46.7 inches tall. Provided that their limbs and torso fit within the offered room of the Foonf and Fllo, then they could use the car seats up to that age.

 

Good All-In-One Car Seats


 

 

Will It Fit In My Car?


 

Clek Foonf

Clek Fllo

Width:

16.9 inches

Height (Rear-Facing):

25.5 to 28.5 inches

23.5 to 27 inches

Height (Forward-Facing):

28 to 32.5 inches

26 to 31 inches

Depth/Length (Rear-Facing):

33 inches

32.5 inches

Depth/Length (Forward-Facing):

12.5 forward-facing

 

Similarity

  • Clek Foonf and Fllo have the same width, as shown in the table. With this width, they could both be ideal candidates for 3-across car seat.

Differences

  • Foonf is taller than Fllo. Fllo is more compact than the Foonf so it can sit 1.5 inches lower in a car.
  • Foonf requires its anti-rebound bar (ARB) to be installed when used in rear facing. While Fllo’s ARB is optional in the US, it is a requirement in Canada. Thus, Fllo could fit in smaller cars without its ARB.
  • With Foonf, there is a base that must be added to it in rear facing installation so it will sit higher in a car, closer to the roof. With Fllo, the recline foot is already integrated in its base, so there will be no additional height to consider.

 

Good Two-Way Car Seats


 

 

Installation 


 

 

Clek Foonf

Clek Fllo

Do I need to use a pool noodle/rolled towel?

Yes, allowed as stated in the manual

No, not mentioned in the manual

Easy To Install Rear-Facing?

Yes

Easy To Install Forward-Facing?

Yes

Easy To Uninstall?

Yes

# Of Recline Positions:

3

2

Lower Anchor Weight Limit:

Rear Facing: 25 pounds

Forward Facing (Rigid LATCH): 35 pounds*

Rear Facing: 35 pounds

Forward Facing: 40 pounds

 

*If Clek Foonf is installed with the Rigid LATCH along with the vehicle seatbelt, you could forget about the weight limit.

According to reviews, Foonf was installed nicely in 2003/2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee, 1996 Toyota Tercel and Tesla Model S sedan. Fllo mounted well in Prius C, 2014 Forrester, and Subaru cars like the Outback.

 

Similarity

  • Both can be installed with no difficulty.

Differences

  • Rolled Towel/Pool Noodle. If you read the manual for each child restraint, you could learn that you may use pool noodle or rolled towel to achieve correct recline angle for Foonf. There is no mention in the Fllo manual.
  • LATCH Weight Limit. For Foonf, the LATCH weight limit rear-facing is 25 pounds and forward-facing is 35 pounds. For Fllo, the LATCH weight limit is 35 pounds rear-facing and 40 pounds for forward-facing. This means you would need to change the rear-facing installation from lower anchors to vehicle seatbelt earlier with Foonf than with Fllo. You need to monitor and be mindful of the child’s weight limit in order not to exceed these weight limits and keep the child restraints effective in safeguarding the little passengers.
  • Rigid LATCH. The main difference between Foonf and Fllo is the Rigid LATCH. Foonf has been made unique for having this feature for its forward facing installation.

Car seats are generally equipped with flexible fabric strap LATCH. The Rigid LATCH of Foonf features steel components that are integrated into its base. Rigid LATCH has several advantages.

  • Easier Installation. Just slide the connectors into the lower anchors of the car and you would hear a clicking sound.
  • Extra Safety Measures. Compared to the flexible LATCH, Rigid LATCH can provide a more secure and solid installation. The metal on metal connection is tantamount to making the child restraint an extension of the car. With this connection, it prevents the child seat from rotating during a side impact collision, thus decreasing the possibility of injuries to the child. The seat will move in a more controlled behavior, and it would channel the crash forces to the aluminum honeycomb cores at the base.

Sometimes parents would still choose the Fllo with flexible LATCH instead of the Foonf with Rigid LATCH. Fllo is a better option when parents want a smaller and more compact Clek seat and when the car itself has no LATCH/lower anchor connectors in the center seat (where many parents would prefer to install the child passenger seat).

  • Recline. Foonf has 3 recline positions (Positions 2/3 for rear-facing in the US; Position 3 for rear-facing in Canada) while Fllo has 2 (1 each for rear-facing and forward-facing). They also differ in how the rear-facing angle is attained. The Foonf has a wedge-shaped base that must be attached underneath (bottom) of the child restraint. Fllo has a built-in recline foot at the bottom.

With Foonf, there is an available angle for children under 1-year-old and another angle for children above 1-year-old, but it still depend on what parents would like to use as recline. This manual does not mention using pool noodles or rolled towels to be placed under the Fllo. However, this support article at Clek site states that a tightly rolled towel, but not a pool noodle, can be placed under the recline foot to get proper recline angle with Fllo, especially if it is to be installed without the ARB.

In setting up the recline, you may use the two recline line guides (1 for under 22 pounds and another for over 22 pounds) at the side of Fllo, although Clek says that any angle between the two line guides for any weight limit is acceptable.

Anti Rebound Bar. As mentioned earlier, Clek equips these two with ARB for safety and for recline purposes. In Foonf, they require it to be used at all times rear-facing, but optional with Fllo. Not using the ARB in Fllo (to probably fit in a tight space of the vehicle) would cause the need to use tightly rolled towels.

 

Clek Foonf Convertible Car Seat
By
Price: --
(As of: 2021/06/07 8:22 am - Details
×
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on https://www.amazon.com/ at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
)
0 new0 used
(* = affiliate link / image source: Amazon partner program)

 

Safety


 

Clek Foonf

Clek Fllo

Country Of Origin:

Canada

Steel Frame:

Yes

Five-Point Harness?

Yes

Side Impact Tested:

Yes

Approved For Airplane Use:

Yes   

Easy To Buckle And Unbuckle?

Relatively

 

Differences:

  • Foonf has REACT (Rigid-latch Energy Absorbing Crumple Technology) system at the base. In an accident, it would push the seat down the aluminum crumple zone to slow down the child and absorb the impact in a crash.
  • Fllo has EACT (Energy Absorbing Crumple Technology) system that is described to be similar to that of Britax seats’ honeycomb technology. In a forward-facing crash, for instance, through the honeycomb technology at the base of this seat, the energy is compressed downward instead of forward; preventing the child’s head from hitting the front seat.

As of writing this review, I could not find any article regarding any accident that involves Fllo, but I found one review that may have to do with safety. In the review, a parent claimed that the blue lock off of their child’s Fllo was defective. This problem appeared to have reached the knowledge of Clek so its updated 2018 Fllo now features a redesigned lock- off.

The lock-off is now easier to use, and they design it to remain closed when the seat cushion is removed. The forward-facing lock-off now has a thicker bumper made of rubber.

 

Clek Fllo Convertible Car Seat
By
Price: --
(As of: 2021/05/19 4:57 pm - Details
×
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on https://www.amazon.com/ at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
)
0 new0 used
(* = affiliate link / image source: Amazon partner program)

 

 

The Seat


 

Clek Foonf

Clek Fllo

Is The Material Breathable?

Yes

Seat Weight:

38 pounds with rear-facing base;

33 pounds without

25 pounds rear-facing and forward-facing;

28 pounds rear-facing with Anti-Rebound Bar

Machine Washable Cover?

No

Roomy?

Yes

No-Rethread Harness?

No

Comes With An Infant Body Support?

Sold Separately

Easy To Remove Cover?

No

Expiration

9 Years

Comes With A Cup Holder?

Sold Separately

Shoulder Harness Has Pads?

Yes

Crotch Pads?

Yes

Crotch Strap Positions:

2 (4 inches, 6 inches)

 

Similarities

  • Both have breathable covers.
  • Both are roomy and both have no no-rethread harness.
  • Both have no infant body support and a cup holder (sold separately).
  • Both have 9 years’ lifespan.
  • Both have shoulder and crotch pads
  • Both have 2 crotch strap positions.

Difference

  • Foonf considerably weighs more than the Fllo even though both have steel frames. This is because Foonf has the rigid metal LATCH and also its recline mechanism. The built-in bottom part of Fllo is made of plastic.

 

Compare The Price Difference


 

Clek Foonf

Clek Fllo

Check The Latest Price

Check The Latest Price

 

Conclusion


 

In a side by side comparison, I think that it would be more advantageous to get the Foonf instead of the Fllo due to the slight, yet significant difference of the Rigid LATCH feature. You could virtually forget about the lower anchor LATCH weight limit and simply install the seat with Rigid LATCH and seat belt in forward-facing.

This ease of installation can be a determining factor in ensuring that the child will remain secure in a properly-installed car seat. Its energy management system is also superior to that of Fllo.

Still, getting the Fllo would still be a good decision if your car has no lower anchor connectors and if it has such a limited space for installing a child restraint system.

Do You Need More Help Deciding Between

The Clek Foonf And Fllo?

 

Read My Clek Foonf Review

Check Out My Clek Fllo Review

 

What do you think?

I’d love to know your thoughts in the comments section below!

 

Cheers,

sign

 

 

 

The Clek Foonf Vs Fllo

TAGS: 
I'd love to know your thoughts in the comments section below!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}
error: Content is protected !!